A Bud is a Composite Thing
|
||
The Bud Workshop Program can fit path curves to buds in two times three ways. |
||
It can fit them by either,
and supply the λs
and MRDs
corresponding to all six ways. |
||
The following three charts depict the
Tuned
, Projective λs,
on - respectively -
Diameters, Left Radii and
Right Radii,
measured at 7 heights
on
Romanian Walnut 1a,
from 9th December 2006 to 13th February 2007. The first has been
appearing on this site day-by-day for some time now, without
special mention being made (until today, 13th Feb. 2007) that it was
based on diameters. The other two are - for speed - simply screen-captures from
the program, with Legends pasted in. All three charts were obtained by
Fourier synthesis
of the bud's three corresponding λ Spectra,
modified by the
same filter, tuned to the Moon/Saturn
dominant
corresponding to the grand period of observation. |
||
This one, on Diameters, is varying (with growing amplitude) with the Moon/Saturn rhythm, and most, but not all λ dips are coming about when the prediction-model says they should. | ||
This one, on Left Radii, is also varying with the Moon/Saturn rhythm, but the λ dips are not coming when prediction says they should (though they do come by a nearly-constant interval later), and the amplitude seems to grow, peak, then reduce. | ||
And this one, on Right Radii, shows altogether the "best" response of all to the Moon/Saturn rhythm, and has all the λ dips coming pretty well when they are "supposed" to come. | ||
The behaviour showing on the Diameters chart is no doubt intermediate between the other two behaviours, a composite of both. It is clear that the bud is not entirely a unity of form: the two profiles are different, and behave differently. I believe that this reflects the fact that the bud has parts - it is an assembly of sepals and other components. Here is evidence that they co-operate in subtle ways. |